Static source material
PDF, DOCX, presentations, spreadsheets, tables, and informal diagrams hold critical intent but are not executable.
Executable Functional Specification
SyncSilica EFS converts human-readable semiconductor specifications into executable architecture models, design and verification collateral, and implementation-conformance workflows.
EFS execution graph
Architecture intent → verified evidence
Industry challenge
Specifications are largely static documents. Architecture, design, verification, and validation teams manually reinterpret the same intent, while established EDA flows usually begin at RTL.
PDF, DOCX, presentations, spreadsheets, tables, and informal diagrams hold critical intent but are not executable.
Architecture, RTL, verification, and validation teams independently translate the same requirements.
Ambiguity becomes a verification bug, coverage gap, integration issue, or silicon bring-up failure.
Missing architecture layer
EFS complements Cadence, Synopsys, Siemens, RTL copilots, and cloud chip-development platforms by supplying architecture-derived executable intent and generated collateral.
What EFS represents
Represent values, transitions, opcodes, payloads, and communication between IP instances.
Model register events, FSM transitions, waits, acknowledgments, and state-dependent behavior.
Express alternate conditions, loops, asynchronous behavior, timeouts, and event dependencies.
Compose subsystem flows, reusable subflows, multiple IP instances, and out-of-order sequences.
Specification-driven automation
A control table identifies documents, sections, requested extraction, and optional comments—for example, extracting AXI transaction logic from selected protocol sections.
Control table
Protocol definitions, interfaces, functional behavior, requirements, timing constraints, power intent, and performance targets.
Signals, messages, registers, state transitions, alternate conditions, timeouts, subflows, loops, and out-of-order sequences.
RTL templates, testbench scaffolding, assertions, protocol checkers, test stimulus, coverage, and documentation.
Simulation, synthesis, LINT, CDC/RDC, logical equivalence checking, static timing, power, and physical implementation.
Functional, plug-and-play, volume, cross-feature, and coverage validation with mismatch localization.
Agent-centric AI
Uses a control table to select documents, sections, requested extraction, and optional engineering guidance.
Extracts signal, message, register, and event flows from paragraphs, tables, headers, and cross-references.
Converts IF, WHILE, loops, waits, acknowledgments, state transitions, and timing dependencies into logical branches.
Learns protocol and logic patterns, models overlapping protocols, and generates EFS-compatible flows.
Generated artifacts
Protocol definitions, interface definitions, functional behavior, system requirements, and reusable architecture intent.
RTL templates, interface modules, register structures, coding guidance, timing constraints, and power-intent inputs.
Testbench scaffolding, assertions (SVA), protocol checkers, stimulus, coverage models, and documentation.
Functional, plug-and-play, volume, cross-feature, and implementation-conformance workflows.
AXI proof of concept
The demonstrated POC converts high-level functional specifications into EFS, generates EFS checkers, produces a Verilog testbench, executes reset subflows, verifies matching transactions, and localizes condition mismatches.
Extract AXI read, write, response, snoop, atomic, reset, and subsystem flows from selected specification sections.
Run signal, message, register, subflow, and function events as an executable model.
Compare expected EFS behavior with implementation traces and waveform evidence.
Identify the exact IF condition, signal value, transaction, or step that does not conform.
Capability comparison
The uploaded comparison positions EFS as complementary to ChipStack, Cadence, Synopsys, and Zero ASIC—not as a replacement for their RTL, verification, cloud, synthesis, or physical-design capabilities.
| Capability | EFS | ChipStack | Cadence | Synopsys | Zero ASIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specification parsing | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Protocol extraction | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Executable specifications | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Architecture modeling | Yes | Limited | Limited | Limited | Limited |
| RTL productivity AI | Limited / roadmap | Yes | Partial | Partial | Partial |
| Verification automation | Yes | Partial | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Specification-conformance checking | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| EDA-flow integration | Planned | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Industry solutions
Tensor pipelines, DMA, HBM, coherency, command sequencing, error handling, and data-movement validation.
Cache-coherent flows, memory subsystems, interconnects, reset, power states, and complex subsystem sequences.
AXI, CHI, PCIe, CXL, Ethernet, register programming, transaction flows, and interoperability.
ADAS, zonal controllers, BMS, safety behavior, cross-feature interaction, and volume validation.
Server fabrics, accelerators, high-speed links, platform initialization, and fleet-scale validation.
Connect architecture, design, verification, EDA implementation, and silicon validation using one reusable and traceable source of engineering intent.
Request a technical briefing